AB 101, which was introduced by Assembly Bill 1349 in 2016, has not yet seen any lawsuits or complaints filed against it. This law makes it harder for individuals to file consumer fraud claims with the state of California.
The “ab-101 california 2021” is a law that was passed in the year 2021. The law was passed with few complaints.
Submitted by Thomas Elias
When Gov. Gavin Newsom signed AB 101 early this autumn, making a semester of ethnic studies a graduation requirement for all California high schools starting later this decade and developing a statewide model curriculum, there was minimal public outcry.
Newsom’s signing came after he vetoed a proposed curriculum in 2020, which sparked widespread outrage because it had blatant prejudices and lies. The curriculum that was rejected was then completely reworked and enhanced.
However, this did not fix all of the issues. Williamson Evers, a former assistant secretary of education in the United States, and other critics, for example, lambasted the new model curriculum as anti-capitalist, anti-white, and “burdened by faddish dogma.” According to Evers and others, it might lead kids to learn as a “truth” that American society has always been split fairly evenly between oppressors and victims. It also promotes youngsters to identify strongly as members of a group, rather than focusing on their unique talents and accomplishments.
We’re going to get through this together, Atascadero
The new curriculum was forced to include seven “guardrails” to prevent it from promoting anti-Semitic tropes that were present in the rejected first draft, ranging from the false claim that Jews controlled the majority of the trans-Atlantic slave trade to the claim that Jews gave up much of their identity to assume “white privilege” in modern America.
“The fact that seven ‘guardrails’ were thought essential to prevent AB 101 from facilitating…anti-Semitism is itself a startling indictment of the law and the risks it presents for (Jews),” Tammi-Rossman Benjamin, head of the AMCHA Initiative, which analyzes anti-Jewish activities in academia, stated.
She pointed out that the guardrails do not prevent local school districts from employing writers of the original edition’s severely faulty and untruthful version to design their own local programs. Nothing obligates local districts to utilize the state curriculum, which comes with its own set of safeguards and adjustments.
However, Rossman-is Benjamin’s one of the least strong and important Jewish organizations. The Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles and the Jewish Family and Children’s Services Holocaust Center in the San Francisco Bay Area, among other organizations, are more renowned.
Despite the outspokenness of Rossman-Benjamin and written opposition from thousands of Holocaust survivors and 74 Jewish organizations, major Jewish organizations such as the Wiesenthal Center and Jewish federations in San Francisco and Los Angeles remained largely silent as Newsom signed AB 101, though the Wiesenthal Center said it “remains concerned” in an earlier publication.
A news statement sent by Newsom two days before the bill signing may provide some insight into the relative quiet. This announced the foundation of a new “Governor’s Council on Holocaust and Genocide Education,” along with a list of groups that would get funding from it.
The Wiesenthal Center received $10 million, $2.5 million for the expansion of the Holocaust Museum LA (run by the Los Angeles Jewish Federation), $1 million for the renovation of the Tauber Holocaust Library and Archives in the Bay area, which is part of San Francisco’s Jewish Family and Children’s Services, and other grants totaling around $40 million.
Because of the close proximity of the two events, some speculated that there was a relationship between the gifts and the tepid response of prominent Jewish groups when Newsom signed AB 101.
It would be naive to think that a few field excursions to Holocaust museums could undo years of anti-Semitic clichés like those taught in the original state ethnic studies curriculum. Some of these are likely to appear in the curriculum of school districts who employ the original writers to design local programs for use in all grades.
For example, one school system (Hayward Unified) set aside $40 million to pay instructors and design a curriculum for some of the unsuccessful writers. As a result, the anticipated funding for Newsom’s embryonic anti-genocide program in a single district equals the statewide budget.
With the signing of AB 101, future ethnic studies curriculum conflicts in California’s more than 1,000 school districts will most likely be fought at the local level. The Jewish community and other opponents, according to Rossman-Benjamin, “lack the bandwidth (and personnel) to fight these conflicts in every region.”
Meanwhile, Newsom appeased African American and Latino groups dissatisfied with his 2020 veto of the initial ethnic studies proposal, while the major Jewish organizations remained silent.
Newsom now claims to have ensured that all children would begin learning about their own ethnic history in the near future, yet he has made official a curriculum that includes historical inaccuracies and prejudices, with the possibility for many more.
Thomas Elias is an opinion writer for The and the Paso Robles Press; he can be reached at [email protected]
As an example:
As if Loading…
California has a law that requires all public schools to have ethnic studies graduation requirement. This means that students must take a course in Ethnic Studies for their graduation requirements. Reference: california ethnic studies graduation requirement.
- what is ab 101
- ca ab 101 status
- ab 101 crt
- ethnic studies bill california
- california ab101 ethnic studies